Monday, July 29, 2019

Private Practices Less Likely to Invest in EHR Technology

Private practices lag behind healthcare providers in group practices and hospitals in EHR use and health IT adoption, as indicated by a July study by researchers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC).

Jordan Everson, PhD, and his group found huge contrasts in EHR use among 291,234 physicians incorporated into a study.

Everson and others at VUMC thought about rates of verification and wearing down in the meaningful use program from 2011 to 2016. Researchers looked at meaningful use verification rates among individual physicians to the individuals who joined hospitals or group practices during the study time frame.

At last, researchers discovered 49 % of free physicians effectively verified meaningful use in any event once during the program. Relatively, 70 % of the physicians that integrated with group practices or hospitals validated meaningful use.

Besides, around 50 percent of individual physicians that bore witness to meaningful use somewhere in the range of 2011 and 2013 additionally bore witness to in 2015. This finding shows progressively individual physicians left the meaningful use program as years went on than the individuals who had integrated into other practice types.

As indicated by Everson, the study may show that individual physicians have more autonomy in how their practices are run. Accordingly, they may decide not to bear witness to meaningful use or choose to reduce their dependence on EHR technology.

In the mean time, physicians in group practices or hospitals don't have a state in whether they bear witness to the program or not.

"Another approach to translate this is the cost-benefit condition was more terrible for individual physicians," Everson said. "As it were, the money related motivating forces in later years were insufficient to conquer the cost of staying aware of Meaningful Use notwithstanding the time weight of utilizing EHRs. Money related costs are likely especially high for individual physicians who can't spread the cost over a huge organization."

Different components that may impact the reduction in free physicians confirming meaningful use incorporate the maturing individual physician population. As individual physicians get more seasoned as a group, a bigger number of physicians resign in more noteworthy numbers than physicians in hospitals or group practices.

Everson and his group additionally set that free physicians who verified meaningful use were bound to join hospitals or group practices during the study time frame than physicians that had not taken an interest in the EHR Incentive programs.

"That may imply that physicians who are not mechanically sharp don't have the choice to join a greater system to get help with new technologies," Everson said.

The study featured the exceptional difficulties that face individual practices as tension builds to invest in costly EHR technology and other health IT apparatuses.

"These discoveries point toward a developing computerized separate between physicians who stay free and integrated physicians that may have been exacerbated by the [meaningful use] program," expressed researchers in the study report. "Directed public policy, for example, new provincial augmentation centers, ought to be considered to address this uniqueness."

Free practices are by all account not the only offices that lag behind their bigger partners in EHR adoption and use.

A 2017 Black Book study discovered inpatient post-acute care organizations lag altogether behind other healthcare settings in EHR adoption and health data exchange.

Just 19 percent of reacting inpatient post-acute care providers revealed having some EHR system innovative capacities operational in Q4 of 2017 — a 4% expansion from 2016.

Researchers ascribed the moderate rates of EHR adoption in post-acute care settings to contrasts in how much certain healthcare organizations are eager to invest in technology. Many reviewed long haul post-acute care providers did not report intends to invest much in health IT use.

"The colossal detach between the post-acute world and the remainder of the continuum isn't amending as trusted," said Black Book Research Managing Partner Doug Brown. "Discovering approaches to improve correspondences between unique acute care EHRs and post-acute technology is a squeezing issue for isolates providers."
Read More

Friday, July 19, 2019

EHR messaging, workflow can be redesigned to address burnout, study suggests

Dive Brief:

             A survey of 934 physicians with the Palo Alto Medical Foundation (PAMF) discovered they got a normal of 243 electronic "in-basket" messages every week in regards to their patients. Of those, about half were naturally created by PAMF's EHR.

             According to the survey results, distributed Monday in Health Affairs, 36% of reacting doctors announced symptoms of burnout, while 29% said they planned to lessen their clinical workload in the following year. Also, 42% of surveyed physicians got EHR-created messages at higher-than-normal volumes. Those doctors had a 40% more noteworthy probability of detailing symptoms of burnout and a 38% higher likelihood they needed to cut their clinical work hours.

             The study's creators recommended closing off programmed informing to doctors when they're off work and modifying EHR-related work processes so a few errands are assigned to different representatives. They additionally encouraged EHR designers to reevaluate informing calculations, as "physicians probably won't be the most proper recipients of some system-produced messages."

Dive Insight:

At the point when medical practices started conveying EHRs during the 1990s, the goal was to concentrate patient medical accounts to expand effectiveness and help keep away from mistakes, for example, contraindicated medication orders. Notwithstanding, proof keeps on mounting that physicians have had their workload partitioned between observing patients and contributing information, a factor prompting exorbitant burnouts.

At PAMF, a multi-claim to fame medical gathering subsidiary with California hospital system Sutter Health, physicians got a normal of 114 EHR-produced messages every week. Yet, inside medicine and family practice doctors got in excess of 200 week after week messages — an inflow multiple times more prominent than some claim to fame physicians, and 2.5 occasions that of specialists.

Numerous PAMF physicians think about the progression of EHR-produced messages to "a flame hose that is never killed," Dominick Frosch, chief of the association's examination establishment and senior creator of the Health Affairs consider, revealed to Healthcare Dive. "Messages accumulate in their in-container throughout the day. They hit the sack and wake up, and there are significantly more messages. It feels extremely overpowering." The examination recommended message volume — not content — was almost certain adding to burnout.

The messages more often than not remind physicians to arrange lab tests, or approve referrals to strength care. The physicians got EHR-created messages at about twofold the rate of communications from their very own patients and different doctors. PAMF's inner medicine and family practice physicians got an outsized portion of such messages.

EHR-created messages regularly contain updates for ordinary undertakings, for example, requesting occasional blood tests for diabetic patients. "In the event that you have 400 patients with diabetes, that is 400 messages alone at regular intervals," think about lead creator Ming Tai-Seale, an educator at the institute of medicine at the University of California San Diego, revealed to Healthcare Dive.

Respondents' organization of methods for dealing with stress for such workloads is uneven, best case scenario. The survey found that while 70% of respondents practiced in any event two times every week, simply 36% rested at least seven hours per night and just 31% occupied with care exercises once per week. Tai-Seale noticed a recently settled relationship between's utilizing electronic gadgets, for example, cell phones for a really long time and an absence of rest. Despite the fact that this was not investigated explicitly in the examination, she said there was a plausibility carefulness in reacting to EHR messages (which PAMF's doctors can peruse on cell phones) was adding to rest misfortune.

The investigation creators recommended that "constraining work area medicine work during nights, ends of the week, and occasions, except if the physician is accessible if the need arises, could lessen burnout."

And keeping in mind that the creators likewise recommended a few undertakings be designated to different clinicians like attendants, Tai-Seale watched numerous payers still expect physicians to approve test orders. The investigation proposed that payers reevaluate a portion of those approaches.

To help lighten burnout, PAMF propelled a pilot venture in spring 2018 known as the Multi-disciplinary Inbox Support Team (MIST). Rather than doctors getting EHR-created messages naturally, they are first sent to a pool of pharmacists, attendants and medical assistants, who try to deal with the assignment freely. On the off chance that pool staff establishes that physician mediation is required, the message is steered to the suitable specialist.

The MIST activity, first conveyed at a PAMF center in Santa Cruz, California, very quickly diminished EHR-produced messages to physicians by 27%. The taking part doctors "felt it gave significant help," Frosch said. Fog is as of now being acquainted with other PAMF destinations, he included.

Read More

Monday, July 1, 2019

OpenEMR vulnerabilities put patients’ info, medical records at risk

A large number of vulnerabilities in OpenEMR enabled attackers to access patients' health records, see data from a target databases, raise their access on the server, execute system commands, and that's only the tip of the iceberg.

What is OpenEMR?

OpenEMR is a free and open source electronic health records and healthcare practice management software.

It is believed that more than 15000 healthcare organization across the globe use openEMR as their electronic medical records solution. The number of patient records managed through openEMR is estimated to be more than 100 million.

OpenEMR vulnerabilities

The revelation of the vulnerabilities was the result of a manual survey of the software's source code and modifications request with Burp Suite Community Edition. The researchers – all working with cyber security outfit Project Insecurity – did not utilize automated scanners or any source code analysis tools.

The vulnerabilities they found in OpenEMR v5.0.1.3 incorporated an portal authentication bypass, SQL injection and remote code execution bugs, unauthenticated information divulgence, unhindered document transfer, CSRFs, and unauthenticated administrative actions.

The portal authentication bypass is the most dangerous one as it would have permitted (unauthenticated) users (or attackers) to view and modify an individual's health records. Accessing those records was as straightforward as exploring the registration page and modifying the url to access the required page.

"Some of the data which could be stolen because of this imperfection are patient demographics, all Medical Records, prescriptions and medical billing data, appointments scheduled and much more" Cody Zacharias, Red Team, told

More insights regarding the vulnerabilities, the vulnerable code, and some POCs can be found in this report.

OpenEMR Remediation

The researchers revealed their discoveries to the software vendors and waited up to a month before they unveiled them to the public. They also offered advice on changes for remediating the defects.

“The OpenEMR community is very thankful to Project Insecurity for their report, which led to an improvement in OpenEMR’s security. Responsible security vulnerability reporting is an invaluable asset for OpenEMR and all open source projects,” noted Brady G. Miller, CEO of

 “The OpenEMR community takes security seriously and considered this vulnerability high priority since one of the reported vulnerabilities did not require authentication. A patch was promptly released and announced to the community. Additionally, all downstream packages and cloud offerings were patched.” is known to rush to respond to responsible powerlessness revelation and be appreciative to researchers who go out of the way to jab through the software for security defects.

The way that the software is open source is something that prodded Project Insecurity to devote their opportunity to inspecting the code, as it implied that they could test it with no negative legal ramifications.

The best possible plan of action seems to be switching to a more prominent EHR system, rather than opting for openEMR. Of course there are several secure openEMR systems like ZH healthcare's ZH openEMR, but security is something that can be compromised with open source systems.
Read More

Friday, May 31, 2019

KHIN creates HIE patient portal, accepts patient-provided data

The Kansas Health Information Network (KHIN) is planning todispatch a first-of-its-kind HIE-based patient portal for all individuals from the statewide system, reports the Wichita Eagle. Rather than association with a primary care physician's electronic health record, the portal will draw together all accessible information through the health information exchange (HIE) systems, and will likewise enable patients to transfer their very own data to the record.

"The motive is to truly enable patients to turn out to be better engaged with their health care data," says KHIN Executive Director Laura McCrary. "If they don't have a spot where they can see the majority of their health information, it makes it difficult to be locked in on if you don't have the foggiest idea about your present rundown of medications or the consequences of your last test or your current diagnosis." KHIN has passed one million patients associated with the network, spread more than 300 Kansas providers.

Further,  giving a valuable administration to patients, those providers will get an additional edge heading into Stage 2 of meaningful use, which requires 5% of patients to get to their own information on the web. When a patient sees his/her record through the KHIN portal, the visit will tally towards the insights of each and every supplier he/she is effectively utilizing, McCrary says. Patients can likewise safely email their providers to pose inquiries or schedule appointments.

"With their well built roles and connections as health information aggregators and integrators, HIEs are ready to go into the condition, providing value to both two consumers and providers," says JeffDonnell, President of NoMoreClipboard, which serves as the power to the KHIN portal. "HIEs are outfitted to integrate with whatever systems and technologies their providers as of now use, and they can aggregate and distribute health data from different sources directly to consumers in an standard data format"

Clients will likewise have the option to transfer data generated by patients, for example, exercise and diet information and over-the-counter medicine records, just as records from providers who may not be partaking in the HIE. Patient-generated data stands as a speculative piece of meaningful use Stage 3 necessity for significant use, and is ending up increasingly well known with patients who use mHealth applications and personal tracking beacons to monitor their health.

KHIN will likewise be handling the issue of putting away pictures online sooner rather than later. X-rays and other imaging studies can gobble up server space at a quicker rate, and the HIE is looking for a prudent method to give picture sharing usefulness without copying documents onto CDs. Rather, KHIN is examining approaches to streamline cloud-based access to the data for providers requiring visual verification of the documents. "If there's an approach to make it accessible continuously to providers and patients and an approach to store it in a manner that doesn't occupy so much room, we're searching for an organization to do those things," McCrary said.

The portal will be accessible for free to Kansas patients, and access to the system is incorporated into the expenses provider members already pay to take part in the HIE. McCrary trusts the portal will go live within the next month.

Read More

Tuesday, May 21, 2019

Using EHRs to integrate mental, clinical health difficult due to privacy concerns

The Bipartisan Policy Center (BPC) as of late discharged a report titled Integrating Clinical and Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities, which inspects boundaries to integrating behavioral health treatment into clinical care just as policy solutions. One of the challenges tended to is the incorporation of behavioral health records into clinicalelectronic health records (EHRs).

The government rule that secures the privacy of patients with substance use and other mental health disorders is proposed to guarantee they can be treated without confronting antagonistic results, for example, loss of work or lodging. Be that as it may, this resolution empowers siloed mental health.

Marian F. Barons, M.D., FAAP, a specialist in integrating mental and behavioral health services into primary care pediatrics, noticed that technology has made it all the more challenging to encourage joining.

"In the days before the EHR, mental health providers kept private notes in secured drawers workplaces," she said. "Presently with EHRs, they should record analyses and treatment suggestions in the diagram so the entire care group can be in agreement, yet most EHRs don't have the usefulness to keep the remainder of the mental health notes totally private. So now mental health providers are forced to perform work-arounds like placing notes in isolated places or even twofold graphing. It makes giving quality coordinated mental health care challenging."

These issues are aggravated for pediatric providers who need to include caregivers in patient care, while keeping portions of the diagram secret from them. It is challenging for providers and practices when EHRs don't bolster different dimensions of secrecy.

A portion of the issues that emerge with integrating mental health care records into the EHR could be eased by making EHRs increasingly consistent with other pediatric workflows, for example, intermediary get to.

"The issues with the EHR and classification that encompass mental health records are like those in immature health," Dr. Dukes said. "In the two circumstances, there is a requirement for dimensions of revelation and classification in the EHR and furthermore in the patient and family entrance. Most EHRs don't have a decent method for doing this. With mental health, there is the additional trouble of keeping portions of notes classified from different providers too."

Dr. Barons said pediatrics is one of a kind in different ways not tended to in this report. "Pediatric mental health care incorporates health advancement, primary and optional avoidance, screening and co-the board just as evaluation and treatment," she said.

The BPC report talks about utilizing funding from the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act to support or require mental health providers to utilize EHRs. Giving all the more funding, be that as it may, may not improve EHR adoption rates if privacy and classification issues are not tended to.

The report recognizes there are chances in moving mental health providers to electronic records however recommends mix ought to be the objective. The report focuses on that the narcotic pandemic has featured the significance of trading important health care and mental health information to give far reaching care to patients and families.

As medicine moves from a fee-for-service framework to value-based and worldwide installments, there is a more prominent accentuation on incorporated care. In any case, the report just incompletely addresses the noteworthy obstructions to completely integrating mental health and clinical care.

Dr. Lords is working with the creators of the report to address pediatric-explicit concerns and give proposals.
Read More

Tuesday, May 14, 2019

How to Design a Comprehensive EHR Usability Assessment

Playing out an EHR usability appraisal can bolster viable EHR optimization ventures for healthcare organizations.

EHR Usability Assessment
10 years after the HITECH Act of 2009 first boosted EHR adoption, numerous physicians stay disappointed with EHR design and are looking for improvements to EHR usability. This is where a EHR system with a cognitive design can help.

Upgrading an EHR with the goal that it offers natural, streamlined workflows is basic for advancing clinical effectiveness and lessening provider load. Shortening the measure of time clinicians spend filtering through patient data and exploring the EHR interface can eliminate unproductive keyboard time and enable providers to invest more energy cooperating eye to eye with patients.

Given that most physicians refer to the patient-provider relationship as their essential wellspring of profession satisfaction with their careers, moving the concentrate far from EHR data passage is a top need for healthcare administration.

Increasingly instinctive EHR interfaces may likewise demonstrate to be a shelter to patient well-being, as indicated by a 2018 JAMA research report. Researchers discovered issues with EHR usability may add to episodes of patient damage. Moreover, inquiry about proposed rates of patient satisfaction decreased when providers spend a noteworthy extent of the patient experience pondering over EHR systems.

Searching for ONC-certified health IT systems amid the EHR selection procedure can give healthcare authority some confirmation that a health IT system will have buyers confronting highlights proposed to help usability. Certified EHR technology innovation (CEHRT) must experience a pattern dimension of EHR usability testing so as to acquire affirmation.

Nonetheless, some healthcare industry partners have contended that the usability testing segment of the ONC Health IT Certification Program needs thoroughness and neglects to assess usefulness all through the EHR life-cycle.

Directing an EHR usability appraisal post-execution can help healthcare organizations evaluate the proficiency and adequacy of their EHR innovation, develop workflows that meet their particular needs, and pinpoint open doors for improving user fulfilment.


HIMSS characterizes EHR usability as "the adequacy, effectiveness and fulfilment with which explicit users can accomplish a particular arrangement of tasks in a specific environment."

The "usability" of a specific system can be surveyed by recognizing how well it meets criteria in nine key classes.


A basically designed EHR interface does exclude information or visual components that are pointless for finishing administrative or clinical tasks. Straightforward interfaces lessen the probability physicians will be overpowered by the measure of data showing up on their screens.

EHR systems are designed in view of reducing the effort like featuring significant information utilizing obvious prompts and incorporating alternatives that are straightforward. Featuring key information enables providers to discover pertinent data all the more rapidly. The design of the interface itself is clear, clean, and uncluttered.

Regular and Natural

As per HIMSS, regular EHR interfaces ought to incorporate "screen representations that are well-known to regular day to day existence, or ordinarily expected PC encounters for the clinician."

Clinical workflows in a characteristic EHR interface are explicit to the necessities of clinicians. The interface is likewise natural and simple to figure out how to confine the weight of EHR training.


In a predictable comprehensive EHR interface, all pieces of the application have a similar look and feel. Phrasing and data passage fields are additionally utilized and put reliably, and providers can move flawlessly through various workflows. Steady EHR interfaces advance congruity and decrease disarray for providers.

Forgiveness and feedback

Data section blunders are common. In the event that providers commit an error inside the system, a generous application enables users to recuperate from mistakes effectively. The system additionally gives proper and non-noisy feedback to the user about activities they are going to take or have officially taken to diminish the probability a user will make an unintended move.

The system additionally advises users on the extent a move will make, and clears up the motivation behind the activity.

Effective utilization of language

Language utilized inside shopper benevolent EHR systems mirrors words clinicians use in practice, while additionally giving mapping to standardize codes and terms for data recovery. Rundown and section structure decisions are unambiguous. In general, language inside the EHR interface should peruse like common English.

Productive interactions

An EHR system that empowers productive interactions is designed to limit the number of steps or clicks required to finish tasks.

A productive EHR system additionally offers a wide range of navigation choices, for example, shortcuts for experienced users to minimize the interaction time. Navigation techniques limit the requirement for user developments including looking over and exchanging among composing and clicking the mouse to streamline EHR use for clinicians.

Effective information presentation

The design of the EHR interface utilizes clear textual styles and outwardly engaging components to enable users to effortlessly devour information.

High-value data or unusual values for clinical data are featured or introduced here and there that passes on importance. For instance, a system may utilize red content or pictures to flag that a data component is anomalous and should be tended to desperately.

Preservation of continuity

The EHR interface incorporates insignificant screen changes and visual interference while providers are finishing tasks, enabling users to concentrate on the substance of the work process as opposed to adjusting to another environment after each activity.

Minimized Cognitive Load

To limit intellectual burden, EHR data ought to be firmly organized by task without expecting users to get to various screens at the same time.

EHR alarms ought to be succinct, useful, and suitable. Guaranteeing EHR cautions are just utilized in high-sway circumstances decreases the probability of EHR ready weariness, which can represent a danger to patient well being now and again.

A purchaser neighbourly EHR system likewise performs computations consequently for providers to lessen psychological burden and anticipate human mistake.

Deciding if an EHR system has these characteristics can be a test given the subjectivity of user experience. In any case, healthcare organizations can work off industry inquire about while recognizing potential roads for leading a complete EHR usability evaluation amid and after execution.


EHR Assessment Concepts

Health IT developers and healthcare organizations settle on choices all through the EHR life-cycle that influence a system's level of usability.

Government controllers, for example, ONC can test an EHR system's presentation against key measurements preceding usage, however the onus falls on healthcare organizations to decide if a system addresses the issues of its providers and novel environment.

In a 2018 report, Pew Charitable Trusts, AMA, and MedStar Health's National Center for Human Factors in Healthcare distinguished various ways healthcare organizations can guarantee EHR usability testing precisely assesses a wide scope of usefulness and potential situations.

Initially, the organizations proposed healthcare administration consider every key task when arranging an EHR usability appraisal.

"Developer usability testing performed for accreditation centers around EHR capacities required by ONC," composed the organizations. "A few vendors develop experiments that incorporate tasks to assess well-being, however this practice isn't inescapable. Experiments ought to likewise concentrate on progressively key tasks in which the utilization of these systems can influence well-being."

The organizations likewise exhorted that an EHR usability evaluation be illustrative of the essential end-user, regardless of whether that is a medical attendant, a physician, or another certified staff part.

"Whenever possible, speak to finish workflows that include numerous kinds of clinicians taking an interest in the situation at the same time," the report exhorted.

As a major aspect of guaranteeing EHR usability evaluations are illustrative of a healthcare association's end users, Pew suggests healthcare organizations think about the demands of its clinical workflows, environment, and any EHR-coordinated outsider innovations. Healthcare organizations may likewise need to guarantee usability appraisals are clinically important.

Seat and its accomplices additionally focused on that surveying EHR usability at normal interim is fundamental for precisely measuring EHR usefulness.

"Different phases of the product life cycle, including how the product is altered by health care facilities and how software redesigns are executed, can show distinctive usability and well-being challenges," the organizations composed.

At long last, Pew and its accomplices proposed healthcare organizations consider the socio-specialized environment of their office while evaluating the proficiency and adequacy of EHR highlights.

"Confirmation testing, directed before execution in healthcare facilities, centers around the discharged EHR product and may not control for different components that can impact security," the organizations forewarned. "For instance, the sort of preparations clinicians get decides their insight into the EHR's highlights, including how to arrange drugs, symptomatic pictures, and lab tests effectively and securely."

"Furthermore, the healthcare office may settle on choices amid EHR usage about how to organize information in the system, which influences how clinicians connect with the innovation," the creators proceeded.

In view of these ideas, healthcare organizations can distinguish solid objectives and measures for a meaningful EHR usability appraisal.

Pew and its partners suggest that healthcare organizations recognize solid objectives and measures that target a particular objective before starting assessments. Also, the organizations proposed healthcare association initiatives guaranteed experiments are reproducible and unambiguous.

“Developing and using test cases that adhere to these criteria will provide greater rigour to the evaluation of clinician interaction with EHRs and can serve to better highlight specific usability and safety challenges in the design, customization, or use of products before patients are harmed,” advised authors in the report.


HIMSS categorizes EHR usability testing in one of the two ways: formative and summative.
Health IT developers are responsible for formative testing. Formative testing includes activities that help developers understand the user and clinical workflows, make iterative improvements to the product, and design the EHR interface in accordance with user needs.

Healthcare organizations perform summative testing. Summative EHR usability activities include expert review, performance testing, risk assessment, and one-on-one usability testing.

In combination, these activities can help healthcare providers evaluate efficiency, effectiveness, cognitive load, and other principles of EHR usability.

HIMSS recommends healthcare organizations test aspects of EHR usability in the following ways:


Expert review and one-on-one usability testing can be effective in measuring efficiency, according to HIMSS.

One-on-one usability testing can be performed in conjunction with an expert, intermediate, or novice end user. In one-on-one usability testing, end users are prompted to complete key tasks within the EHR interface and collect performance data during each task.

“Expert review is a human factors expert review of the product,” wrote HIMSS. “As part of the review, usability specialists identified areas in the product where the product conforms or fails to conform to Human Factors' best practices.”

One-on-one usability testing requires close monitoring to ensure performance data is accurately recorded.

“Sessions are frequently recorded with special software that captures interactions with the graphical user interfaces and matches the interactions with time stamps,” stated HIMSS.

Users can record key indicators such as the time it takes to perform a particular task, the number of interactions necessary to complete the task, the number of screens visited to complete a scenario within clinical workflows, the number of times the ‘back’ button is used, and the time it takes to complete a set of instructions within the EHR system.

In 2017, Arcadia Healthcare Solutions measured the number of clicks a single provider needed to complete her clinical and administrative tasks throughout an average workday.

According to Arcadia Healthcare Solution’s research, the clinician needed 2,541 clicks to document 24 patient encounters over the course of a 16-hour workday.

The results confirm provider concerns that EHR interfaces lack efficiency and require providers to perform a high number of interactions to fulfil reporting requirements and complete clinical documentation.

Recording the amount of time providers spend completing tasks within the EHR can help healthcare organizations identify particularly labor-intensive aspects of clinical documentation to guide workflow optimization.

Organizations that undertake similar examinations of routine EHR use may be able to identify areas for improvement or new workflow strategies that minimize cognitive fatigue.


Risk analysis exercises are helpful for determining a system’s ability to avoid errors when completing clinical tasks.

HIMSS recommends using the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA), or a topological risk analysis.

The FMEA risk management tool analyzes potential failure using three criteria: occurrence, severity, and detection.

To measure occurrence, experts must determine the cause of failures and the frequency with which they are likely to happen. Severity criteria measures the impact of failures on the end user or the patient, and detection criteria measures the likelihood that failures will be detected by the system.
Topological risk analyses allow healthcare organizations to identify risk elements including single-point failures and common-mode failures.

“A single‐point failure would be any action by the clinician that results in harm, injury or death to the patient without a redundant safety check in place,” clarified HIMSS.

For example, if a provider mistakenly prescribed a drug to an allergic patient because drug allergy data was not displayed on the ordering screen, this would be considered a single-point failure.
Meanwhile, a common-mode failure is a safety incident in which multiple actions by the clinician stem from a single cause.

If a healthcare organization required prescribers to access multiple screens and memorize patient information to complete prescribing processes, errors occurring as a result of this ineffective process would be considered common-mode failures.

“A usability rating process can be developed by adapting risk assessment methodologies to objectively evaluate the potential for user error,” states HIMSS. “Certain design factors can lead to user error which would have patient safety implications.”

One-on-one usability testing can also help to measure effectiveness. Experts or users can record the number or rate of errors, path taken to complete a task, severity of errors, and number of requests for help to measure effectiveness during usability testing.

Naturalness and consistency

To measure consistency, healthcare organizations can prompt users to conduct one-on-one usability testing using several key metrics. Healthcare organizations can measure the time it takes users to achieve expert performance, the number of icons users remember after completing a task, and the time spent undertaking manual processes.

Healthcare organizations can also compare difference in completion time for novice and experienced users to gauge how familiarity with a system contributes to successful use.

Cognitive load

Measuring cognitive load is a complex process. Healthcare organizations may need to call upon cognitive psychologists to assist in administering assessments of cognitive load.

ONC’s Change Package for EHR Usability recommends healthcare organizations utilize the NASA Task Load Index to assess cognitive workload.

The NASA Task Load Index (TLX) is a workload assessment tool that allows users to assess task load or burden based on the mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance effort, and frustration of the human,” state ONC officials in the report.

“NASA TLX is widely used as a workload measurement tool across industries and is available as a printed PDF document or paper-and-pencil use, or as a mobile application.”.

AHRQ offers healthcare stakeholders a guide on how to use NASA TLX to measure cognitive load during EHR usability assessments.

User satisfaction

Finally, measuring user satisfaction is imperative for determining EHR usability. However, user satisfaction ratings are subjective and should be viewed accordingly.

Healthcare organizations can prompt users to complete tasks within the EHR and subsequently rate the ease and quality of their experience according to a point scale.

When researchers from the University of Missouri tested user satisfaction with different EHR note designs for a 2017 study, they asked participating clinicians to assign usability ratings to each design template based on the System Usability Scale (SUS).

SUS is a standard methodology that consists of 10 questions with five response options per question ranging from “strongly agree” to “strongly disagree.”

In addition to using SUS, researchers also prompted study participants to perform one-on-one usability testing with different EHR note designs.

“We simulated their utility for clinical practice by imposing time limits and by interrupting one of the tasks with a typical clinical interruption,” wrote researchers in the study report. “For each session, we recorded audio, computer-screen activity, eye tracking, and made field notes.”

Analyzing user performance data alongside SUS user satisfaction ratings helped researchers determine which EHR note design best met the needs of clinicians and promoted the highest level of clinical efficiency.

EHR usability can significantly affect clinical productivity, provider satisfaction, and patient safety. By observing and measuring provider interactions with EHR technology, healthcare organizations can get a sense of how well a technology, workflow, or application fits within their specific clinical environment.
Read More

Monday, May 6, 2019

Telemedicine The Future of Healthcare

Telemedicine | Telehealth

Telemedicine, in contrast to late healthcare innovations, has been around for more than 40 years now. Today, it utilizes present day technologies in telecommunications, portable technology and consumer electronics to convey quality medical diagnoses and care to people across the globe. As the United Nation calls for widespread healthcare by 2030, telemedicine is handling most difficulties in managing access to healthcare. An ongoing report from The Business Research Company demonstrates that the worldwide market for telemedicine technology, presently worth $31.8 billion, will reach $77.2 billion by 2022.

Global Trends in telemedicine

Fast progressions in associated care technology, enormous data and analytics are proceeding to move telemedicine into the standard. The expansion of brilliant gadgets combined with democratization of the web is making teleconsultations substantially more helpful, in the end prompting the development of consumer-to-supplier telemedicine. The expanding utilization of keen and associated wellness wearables and telehealth applications, for example, Practo, Portea, Lybrate and so forth is an unmistakable indication of the market moving past the peripheries of essential healthcare get to. While nations, for example, Sweden, The Netherlands and Singapore as of now have high a rate of reception of associated care technology, other creating markets, for example, India, Russia and Brazil are moving towards improvement of better electronic health record (EHR) and clinical decision support systems (CDS) to make progress into the business.

Impact of telemedicine on patient life and experience

Telemedicine decreases the requirement for long travel or in-person patients visits for patients and thus, holds guarantee in taking care of the issue of access to quality healthcare consistently and at the patient's simplicity and accommodation. A patient-driven approach to give quality healthcare administrations, telemedicine has yielded an open door for institutionalization and value in the arrangement of healthcare, both inside nations and crosswise over landmasses. Notwithstanding remote access, telemedicine additionally enables specialists to counsel among themselves and furthermore contact experts independent of land areas. It additionally goes about as a key driver for patient commitment, by helping patients keep up registration arrangements and care plans. This improves patient care and prompts decreased expenses for the healthcare specialist co-op just as the patient. Enrolment of patients in remote checking programs, utilization of portable applications, video conferencing and messages for virtual interview and treatment are the most widely recognized practices followed in telemedicine today.

Generally, telemedicine has been related with giving better healthcare access to under-served networks and provincial populaces, low-salary gatherings, and locales with restricted framework, where its applications were principally used to connect healthcare suppliers with experts, referral hospitals, and tertiary care focuses. Despite the fact that ease telemedicine applications have turned out to be practical, clinically valuable, and manageable in such settings, there are a couple of worries that should be routed to empower scaled appropriation of these applications.

ICT proficiency and the capacity to utilize the gear adequately according to calendar and patient's necessities are fundamental to give viable and consistent telemedicine administrations. Further, archiving use, treatment techniques and results is likewise important to guarantee an organized and idiot proof framework. Henceforth, preparing work force to adequately convey telemedicine administrations, and the set-up and support of telemedicine hardware, will facilitate the infiltration of the business. Besides, handling human and social factors, for example, opposition from patients and healthcare specialists towards receiving administrations that vary from conventional methodologies or indigenous practices is the need of great importance. This should be possible by instructing and spreading mindfulness about the advantages of these mechanical headways and the changing scene of healthcare.

The absence of a worldwide lawful system and interior approaches of various governments to enable health experts to convey benefits in various locales and nations is another issue that hinders the broad reception of telemedicine. A worldwide exertion is being used to address lawful and strategy driven issues just as speculation and repayment, selection and digital security worries, to make telemedicine showcase slants increasingly unmistakable later on. In India as well, with the presentation of Ayushman Bharat Scheme, the greatest health financing plan by the Government of India, trailed by NITI Aayog getting built up in different states all through the nation, and the support of ISRO for forefront satellite technology - there is a major push towards better reach and practice of patient care.

Telemedicine the Future of Healthcare

With improved web speeds (4G, broadband) and development in troublesome technologies, the world is moving towards an increasingly associated future that involves faster, simpler and progressively customized conveyance everything being equal. Healthcare is no exemption to this ocean change. Later on, broad research and mechanical progressions will clear route for a more profound investigate emergency treatment and speciality medicine, for example, teleophthalmology, OB-GYN and emotional well-being. The incorporation of increased and computer generated reality, 3-D printing, robotics, and progressed IoT and AI capacities will prompt improved value-based care for consumers and increasingly customized and altered client experience. Thus, it is sheltered to state that in this hyper-associated world, the utilization of telemedicine and related technologies will change the manner in which healthcare administrations are conveyed and help to accomplish an incorporated and consistent healthcare experience for everybody.
Read More

Friday, January 4, 2019

What Doctors want from EHR vendors in 2019

A little listening and responsiveness could go a long way to help cure alert fatigue and physician burnout in the year ahead.

EHR Vendors

Software solutions that imply to be creative are flooding the healthcare world, however regularly turn out to be to a greater issue than the ones they set out to solve.

An recent CNBC report explained how business people, engineers and developers need to match with physicians to gain better knowledge into the sort of issues they plan to solve.

For instance, it points to Epic sending engineers to open heart surgeries as a representation of the standard medical software developers should strive toward.

Most EHR vendors don't have that level of association with the practitioner and the outcome is alert fatigue, hours spent on data collection, and a general discomfort towards software solutions that should help, yet extremely mean more work and another cumbersome interface.


Perceiving this, the American Medical Association has as of late combined with innovation developers and clinicians to develop the DigitalHealth Implementation Book, which enables physicians to all the more likely receive health innovation in their practices – and proposes what EHR vendors can do to make their items increasingly valuable and easy to understand.

Since practices differ and one software can be utilized in various routes relying upon the provider, developers should be more responsive to the demands for information and support.

Furthermore, AMA prescribes that developers need to tune in to physician criticism and focus on hearing how doctors really utilize their software so that they can seamlessly enhance their solutions.


Physicians trying to adapt to technology and innovation issues were a common thing for 2018. Burnout is a noteworthy issue that numerous developers and healthcare systems are trying really hard to fix.

Correspondingly, others in the healthcare space are perceiving how responses and gathering feedback can prompt better care for patients.

It pursues, at that point, that this method works in reverse for developers. Investing more time with real physicians and watching them at work will enable EHR vendors to develop features that will fit into a physician workflow.

Read More

Thursday, December 27, 2018

Interoperability Issues? Most Blame EHR Integration

New federal report highlights progress in health IT, and what health systems should focus on

Interoperability Issues

Interoperability stays one of the biggest challenges in health information technology, and settling these issues holds incredible guarantee to upgrade innovation. As we move into another year, an ongoing report by the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology reveals insight into the condition of interoperability and where health systems should center to gain continuous progress.

Where do the most serious issues lie? The most widely recognized explanation behind not utilizing information received electronically from outside the hospital system is the issues faced while integrating information into the electronic health record (EHR) system. The best hindrance to sending information by means of electronic exchange is trouble finding providers' locations.

An ONC study, "Variety in Interoperability Among U.S. Non-government Acute Care Hospitals in 2017," shows hospitals gained critical ground amid 2016 and 2017, yet challenges still exist. Among the barriers to health information exchange, about six out of 10 hospitals revealed difficulties trading patient health information crosswise over various vendor platforms, up from five of every 10 in 2016.

The report estimates advance in four zones (or areas) identified with the exchange of EHR information: sending, receiving, finding, and integrating.

"Taking part in every one of the four spaces of EHR interoperability is critical to guarantee that clinicians have the information they require at the point of care," as per the report. "Eighty-three percent of hospitals that occupied with each of the four areas of interoperability detailed having information electronically accessible at the point of care. This is about 30% higher than hospitals that occupied with three of those areas."

Following are features from the report, giving further knowledge into advancement and staying points:

             Hospitals that occupied with each of the four interoperability areas expanded by 41% since 2016

             Hospitals that occupied with four spaces of interoperability were more than multiple times bound to have information electronically accessible than hospitals that just send and get rundown of care records

             Nearly three of every 10 little, rustic, and Critical Care Access hospitals (CAHs) could send, get, find, and incorporate synopsis of care records in 2017

             Small, provincial, and CAHs expanded their rates of commitment in four interoperability spaces by half amid 2016 and 2017

             Small, provincial, and CAHs trail their partners over each of the four spaces of interoperability

No Outside Sources

Trouble integrating information into the EHR was the most widely recognized reason detailed by hospitals for not utilizing health information got electronically from sources outside their health system. In any case, that is not all.

Absence of opportune information, unusable organizations, and trouble finding explicit, significant information likewise made the rundown, as indicated by the 2017 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey, Information Technology Supplement.

Among the clarifications health systems accommodated seldom or failing to use patient health information got electronically from providers or sources outside their health system:

             Difficult to coordinate information in EHR: 55% (level of hospitals refering to this reason)

             Information not constantly accessible when required (e.g. opportune): 47%

             Information not exhibited in a helpful arrangement: 31%

             Information that is explicit and applicable is elusive: 20%

             Information accessible and incorporated into the EHR however not part of clinicians' work process: 16%

             Do not confide in precision of information: 10%

             Vocabulary or potentially semantic portrayal contrasts limit use: 7%


Hospitals pointed to an intriguing issue when requested to disclose their essential failure to send information however an electronic exchange: Difficulty finding providers' locations. The joined reasons, positioned all together paying little respect to hospital characterization (little, country, CAH, or national) include:

             Difficult to discover providers' locations

             Exchange partners' EHR system needs ability to get data

             Exchange partners we might want to send data to don't have an EHR or other electronic system to get data

             Many beneficiaries of care outlines report that the information isn't helpful

             Cumbersome work process to send the information from our EHR system

             The intricacy of state and government privacy and security regulations makes it troublesome for us to decide if it is reasonable to electronically exchange patient health information

             Lack the specialized capacity to electronically send patient health information to outside providers or different sources

Additional Barriers

The report likewise subtleties different barriers identified with trading patient health information, refering to the 2017 AHA survey:

             Greater challenges trading data crosswise over various vendor platforms

             Paying extra expenses to exchange with organizations outside our system

             [Need to] create redid interfaces so as to electronically exchange health information

"Strategies went for tending to these barriers will be especially imperative for enhancing interoperable exchange in health care," the report closed. "The 2015 Edition of the health IT accreditation criteria incorporates refreshed specialized prerequisites that take into account innovation to happen around application programming interfaces (APIs) and interoperability-centered principles to such an extent that data are available and can be all the more effectively exchanged. The 21st Century Cures Act of 2016 further expands upon this work to enhance data sharing by requiring the improvement of open APIs and a Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement. These endeavors, alongside numerous others, should facilitate upgrades in interoperability."
Read More

Thursday, December 20, 2018

4 ways AI can make EHR systems more physician-friendly

Artificial Intelligence in EHR Software

In spite of the fact that AI abilities for EHR systems are restricted, integrated conveyance networks are taking a shot at utilizing AI to make EHRs increasingly flexible and intelligent, three writers write in Harvard Business Review.

"While AI is being connected in EHR systems basically to enhance data disclosure and extraction and customize treatment proposals, it can possibly make EHRs more easy to use," the creators composed. "This is a critical objective, as EHRs are entangled and difficult to utilize and are frequently refered to as adding to clinician burnout."

The article was composed by Thomas Davenport, PhD, president's recognized teacher in management and IT at Babson College in Wellesley, Mass.; Tonya Hongsermeier, MD, VP and chief medical information officer at Burlington, Mass.- based Lahey Health and Kimberly Alba McCord, PhD competitor at the University Hospital Basel in Switzerland.

Four different ways conveyance networks are utilizing AI to make EHR systems increasingly flexible:

1. Data extraction from faxes, clinical notes. The creators featured a few instances of how conveyance networks are utilizing AI in patient data. Providers would already be able to pull data from faxes at OneMedical, an enrollment based practice concentrated on enhancing healthcare availability, or by utilizing blueEHRs cloud-based EHR. Healthcare innovation and services organization Flatiron Health's human "abstractors" review provider notes and concentrate structured data, utilizing AI to perceive scratch terms and uncover data experiences. Also, Amazon Web Services as of late propelled a cloud-based administration where AI hauls out and records data from clinical notes.

2. Indicative and additionally prescient calculations. Google is collaborating with conveyance networks to create expectation models from enormous data to caution clinicians to conceivably hazardous conditions, for example, sepsis and heart disappointment. Google and a few different new businesses are likewise making AI-inferred picture translation calculations. Healthcare innovation organization Jvion offers a "clinical success machine" that recognizes patients at the most astounding danger for an unfavorable clinical occasion and those well on the way to react to treatment. Every one of these devices could be integrated into EHRs to give decision support and guide treatment systems, the creators composed.

3. Clinical documentation and data section. "Catching clinical notes with characteristic dialect handling enables clinicians to concentrate on their patients as opposed to consoles and screens," the creators composed. Healthcare arrangements organization Nuance offers AI-supported apparatuses that incorporate with business EHRs to support data accumulation and clinical note structure.

4. Clinical decision support. Decision support was beforehand conventional and rule-based, the creators said. Presently, machine-taking in arrangements that gain from new data and empower increasingly customized consideration are originating from different sellers, for example, IBM Watson, Change Healthcare and AllScripts.

Read More